Here are a few more articles to add to the ever growing, but nowhere near comprehensive collection on the rise of Google Print, Amazon, Internet Archive's funding from Yahoo and MSN and Random House's Press Release.
First off, this
older link with several different views on Google Print.
Then there's
Random House's announcement on how they will handle these new services. They seem to be going the digital permissions route rather than the more common electronic right or electronic distribution designation. (PDF warning)
Let's see what else I missed while catching up from Frankfurt and going on vacation. . . .
There's Amazon's
announcement (finally) on a pay per page electronic view of books.
Then there's this story from
Salon that takes a look at the argument.
And finally there's this announcement from
boingboing on a forum at the New York Public Library -
THE BATTLE OF THE BOOKS.
So between Amazon, Random House and Google Print we have 3 different ways to monetize (in a manner of speaking) page hits of actual books.
We also see lawsuits a-plenty for Google Print.
Real quick thoughts on the subject-
What about song lyrics and poems? Both separate and used within books that Amazon is scanning. Fair use on poems and songs doesn't really exist.
So Google is now becoming a content provider? No longer content to just point you to a site, they're actually scanning and providing content under the Google domain. Does this change any understanding of fair use?
There's gonna be a lot more in the coming days as more publisher's start to freak out and write rules for services that have yet to be actualized and used by people. Can you imagine what it would be like once these services are actually at a level where people can use them? Yeah, cue the crickets for a while.